Sovereign cybersecurity
for those who set policy
and protect nations.
identiqa Intelligence supports ministries, national CSIRTs, intelligence services, and KRITIS regulators with strategic threat intelligence, attribution analysis, and decision-grade briefings — built under European jurisdiction, designed for the operational tempo of government work.
Three concerns
government CIOs and CISOs raise in every conversation.
Public-sector cybersecurity is a different problem from commercial cybersecurity. Different threat models, different procurement constraints, different accountability structures — and different consequences when things go wrong.
"Our intelligence is two years out of date."
Threat intelligence consumed at strategic and ministerial level needs to be current, regionally relevant, and interpretable without specialist translation. Most intelligence feeds available to government bodies were designed for commercial SOCs — not for policy-makers, regulators, or executive briefers.
"We can't put national-security data on US infrastructure."
The structural problem is no longer disputed. CLOUD Act exposure, FISA Section 702, executive-order discoverability — all create risks that are unacceptable for ministerial and intelligence workloads. The need is for sovereign infrastructure with capabilities equivalent to commercial alternatives.
"Attribution at the national level is harder than it should be."
When a nation-state-aligned actor targets ministerial systems or critical infrastructure, decisions about response require defensible attribution. Most government bodies depend on partner-agency reporting; few have native capability for independent attribution analysis at strategic confidence levels.
Three engagement modes government bodies most often request.
Initial engagements typically focus on one of these three patterns. Full strategic-partnership relationships develop over years; we structure them carefully from the start.
Strategic Briefings
Periodic intelligence briefings tailored to ministerial and executive audiences. Translates technical threat data into policy recommendations, resource priorities, and decision options at the strategic level.
Threat Intelligence (Government Tier)
Curated threat intelligence focused on European national-security adversaries, critical-infrastructure targeting, and emerging campaign infrastructure. Strategic, operational, and tactical-level feeds available.
Attribution Support
Independent technical attribution analysis for incidents requiring strategic response. Supports decisions about diplomatic action, sanction designations, and protective measures with defensible technical foundation.
From institutional inquiry to strategic engagement.
Government engagements are slower than commercial ones — and they should be. Verification, NDA, procurement-compatible contracting, and operational onboarding each take time. We respect that timeline.
Inquiry from institutional address
Use a verifiable ministerial, agency, or government-body email domain. Brief context: which body, which strategic concern, what timeframe. Anonymous and unverified inquiries are not processed.
Verification & preliminary scoping
Institutional confirmation through standard channels. We verify operational fit before substantive engagement. If your concern is outside our capability or geographic scope, we'll say so directly — and where useful, suggest peer providers.
Bilateral NDA & technical session (90 minutes)
Mutual non-disclosure framework. Substantive discussion of strategic context, expected output, integration with your existing intelligence apparatus. Deliverable is a written engagement proposal with terms compatible with your procurement framework.
Long-term engagement framework
Government engagements typically run multi-year. Annual review cycles, evolving scope based on threat landscape, regular strategic briefings to designated audiences. We invest in the relationship for the long term — and structure contracts accordingly.
Questions government CISOs and policy advisors ask first.
Is identiqa cleared for national-security workloads?
How does this complement our national CSIRT or intelligence service?
What's our procurement path?
Can you brief us at the ministerial level?
How does identiqa relate to other European cybersecurity initiatives (ENISA, EU-CYCLONe)?
What guarantees of independence do we have?
Want to start a strategic conversation?
Submit an inquiry from a verified institutional address. Verification, NDA, and a substantive technical briefing follow — typical timeline three to four weeks to first strategic engagement.
